study new patterns of users, who through mobile devices provide dematerialized content shows that users should refer logically to mobility devices, rich idea. Especially as this week, a court decision has been made, forcing internet service providers to block streaming sites. The illusion of a fight that could be won persists so …
src=”http://actualitte.com/images/actualites/upload_telechargement_ebook_pirate.JPG” ![]()
These are sixteen sites around Allostreaming that the legal sanction struck precisely, and at the initiative of the film industry. The Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris ruled that the streaming was a breach of copyright, and claimed that ISPs, as far as search engines do what is necessary to restrict access or banned. The procedure, which was launched in 2011 by five associations and the federation of film, aimed portals, whose activity is reported as “ dedicated (e) or virtually dedicated ( e) the representation of audiovisual works without the consent of the authors . “
Fundamental Rights against copyright law?
During the next twelve months, the sites in question will be doomed to obscurity: on one side, dereferencing engines, on the other blocking by ISPs. A decision on behalf of the protection of copyright, made “ based on extremely vague provisions of the HADOPI law passed in 2009 “, considers Quadrature du Net.
Tréguer Felix, a founding member of this organization advocacy Users Association, sees a “ very bad news as the blocking appears to be a dangerous extent, especially in the light of inevitable risk of overlocking uses perfectly legal . ”
added: “But encouraging cooperation between Internet players and assigns to censor mirror sites may appear in the future is even more disturbing . After the recent decision in the case between Google Mosley, this judgment has once again endorse the forms of private censorship that grow all over the Internet and undermine fundamental rights. Net players involved must now clearly indicate their refusal to engage in missions justice and private police. “
The Pirate Party, insists: “ This drift laws and their application is very bad news considering the inevitable risk of -blocking perfectly legitimate uses. This judgment encourages cooperation between ISPs and lobbies to censor including mirror sites may appear in the future “by any effective means.” These effective means that the judge does not dare name is in this case the “Deep Packet Inspection” works by filtering a priori of all communications and a “scoring” (assessment of the legality of the content in an automated manner). It is neither more nor less than the beginning of a filter and the death of net neutrality . “
revving engines, ISPs hover
Whereas a change of copyright is not scheduled for tomorrow, and the government that there attellera is clearly not yet in power, the fight against piracy ( or sharing?) will continue. And we still invoke, and again, the sacred defense of copyright, often smoky pretext to denounce the total lack of control of majors. Which ill conceals the lack of innovation. A-t ever heard, as such, Amazon, complaining that piracy deprive the sales? This is interesting to notice.
side of Google, the decision of TGI was coldly received “ class=”s3″> “It is the firm knows intrinsically that each case is more profitable its own trade, the massive blockage. In addition, we can find the contents are not all illegal YouTube, would be one of the best examples.
Different generations of pirates
mikebaird, CC BY 2.0
The engine response is also not in question: in 2013, 200 million queries requesting the blocking of a page have been recorded, and in 99% of case, the application results in a change in a few hours. However, if the engine dereference, the site is not so far removed, and therefore the authorities intend to go through the ISP to make it inaccessible. We understand how the issue of such a censorship prejudice to a free internet, since the ISP is able to intervene in this way.
Practical Guide to new uses
At the same time, a document issued by the Hadopi, that on November 29, was the day on new consumer practices: it was conducting “ a qualitative and quantitative study including illegal access strategies developed by users to access music, movies and TV shows on the Internet .” Only movies, series and music were reviewed – the digital book is carefully kept away.
The study indicates that, as we are witnessing the showrooming in the physical world, the Internet operates by visiting a legal site to find ideas for future downloads – they be between 25 and 35% do so once a week.
But if circumvention tools are numerous and increasingly known, the continued growth of smartphones – and tablets – in the daily consumption necessarily implies that users looking for means of access from their new devices. Streaming sites concçus for smartphones, applications for direct listening and others to download: resources do not miss
.
Access to music is 38% from a mobile, 9 against and 10% for films and series. For tablets, the figures are 17% for music and 12% movies and series.
Cuckoo, is the Owl (q)
The eBook officially represents only 3% of the turnover of the French edition – which actually means that only members of the National Union of publishers publishing are taken into account. For a digital publisher 100% is 100% of the turnover is realized with digital books if their weight is not as important as the big teams NIS, their growth curves do not remain less significant. Demand increases significantly, as some careless conventional houses have an honest pricing policy.
But under Hadopi study, it would have been interesting to see how, through smartphones and tablets, you can buy works under law. After all, offering legal streaming is still quite thin – but remember that a publisher as Publie.net had put in place several years ago for his own catalog. A thin, but mostly inadequate supply: a subscription that offers full access to a catalog does not reflect usage. We do not use the book as we consume music.
src=”http://actualitte.com/images/actualites/Kundera_ebooks.png” ![]()
Milan Kundera, here hacked version refuses scanning books …
As such, the experiment conducted by Scribd is very instructive: the idea was not to sell unlimited readers, but a selection – and why not, in the future a editorialisation offer. Today, Scribd offers 20 tracks per month for $ 8.99, and clearly offer a hit. In contrast to current solutions based on a model of “All You Can Eat” is not a glutton player, unless you want the disgusting
.
Your child facilities – as your download
class=”p1″>
Hadopi notes that users have a “ printing facility for illegal practices ” and notes two points:
A malicious access to works that respondents consider quick and easy, requiring no special technical knowledge (not reserved for “experts” / “experts” in the field).
So only from the target of frequent illicit consumers, there is a form of trivialization of illegal practices (“everybody does it”), with a form of distancing risk getting caught on the way: there is always “worse than itself.”
However, the digital readout necessarily operates on devices that have a connection – forget ebook readers, not very practical for surfing, but considering a second what a tablet can bring to books in seconds, with a connection, even 3G. And the same price for a smartphone: These reading tools may be basic, but no less essential for digital, homothetic or not books
.
If for the purposes of the study, books were excluded because corresponding practical and specific populations, we looked forward to the investigation who actually interrogate the digital book, and illegal consumption by said channels, through the mobility devices …
Besides, what becomes Portal Protection Books solution implemented by informing the SNE?
works dematerialized access strategies published by ActuaLitte.com
Sources : Europe 1, Canoe, Essentials, Hadopi
To further
![]()
src=”http://www.actualitte.com/images/home/c42f26f336464f840ae352338dbbe25c.png”
Hadopi: Legalization of non-profit sharing on the Internet
![]()
src=”http://www.actualitte.com/images/home/ca596786df559c3d153f234521e0a1a2.png”
A politician accused of piracy of books For Dummies
![]()
src=”http://www.actualitte.com/images/home/0a5e6d950484d8fc2afbe396dab91e67.png”
Hacking Cartoon: freak ‘very marginal’ for authors
The file was not closed. Moreover, it has given rise to a new court of TGI Paris. The court upheld the copyright infringement sites Galaxy Allostreaming. 
SUBSCRIBERS – The comet rendezvous with the Sun 
Finally 
The Washington Post cites “people with direct knowledge of the discussions of the company,” claiming that Microsoft must decide this week should take to encrypt their data, and according to what schedule. 
Copyright © 2013 AFP. All rights reserved and of representation. 
Aujourd Today, PrimeSense is mostly presented as a specialist of 3D chips and argues 3D sensing technology used by over 24 million devices worldwide. In particular, integrated in smartphones and tablets sensors.